$495,000 Fine for Old P-QS Refinery

Share

Shell Oil Products U.S. has agreed to pay $495,000 in fines to settle a federal case over violations of air pollution, water pollution and hazardous waste rules at a former Pennzoil-Quaker State base oil refinery in Shreveport, La.

The civil lawsuit, filed by the U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of the federal Environmental Protection Agency, complained the plant repeatedly discharged excessive concentrations of pollutants into a nearby bayou. It also charged the plant with exceeding its permitted level of sulfur dioxide emissions and failing to properly store and inventory hazardous wastes.

Pennzoil-Quaker State remained the defendant in the case even after it sold the refinery to Calumet Lubricants Co. in 2001. At that time,the facilityhad capacity to produce 5,900 barrels per day of paraffinic base oil and 2,700 b/d of naphthenic base oil. Shell assumed responsibility for Pennzoil-Quaker States defense when it bought the automotive consumer products marketer last fall. Shell officials could not be reached for comment.

The Shreveport refinery had a permit regulating its discharge of industrial wastewater into the Brush Bayou. According to the suit, the facility exceeded permitted concentrations of sulfates, suspended solids, or oil and grease for seven consecutive months during 1997 and again in January 1998 and April 1999. In some cases, the actual concentration exceeded the permitted level by more than 400 percent.

The refinery also had a permit regulating discharge of sulfur dioxide from its sulfur recovery unit. The permit was based on Pennzoil-Quaker States stipulation that the unit had capacity to process 19.9 long tons of sulfur per day, just belowthe 20-ton-per-day level that would have brought the facility under more stringent controls.

When the EPA discovered that the unit had processed 20.5 tons of sulfur one day in July 1998, the agency concluded that the unit should have fallen under the more stringent controls and had therefore been in violation since its construction two years earlier. Investigators also cited a valve that was missing a cap required to prevent emissions leaks.

The hazardous waste charges were based on failures to include manifest numbers and material identification numbers on several loads taken to landfills.

Related Topics

Market Topics